Leading Design for Quality and Manufacturability™           

focus.gif (1259 bytes)
The International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), is a premier Design & Design Automation conference, aimed at bridging the gap between and integration of, electronic design tools and processes, integrated circuit technologies, processes & manufacturing, to achieve design quality. ISQED is the pioneer and leading conference dealing with design for manufacturability and quality issues, front to back. The conference provides a forum to present and exchange ideas and to promote the research, development, and application of design techniques & methods, design processes, and EDA design methodologies and tools that address issues which impact the quality of the realization of designs into physical integrated circuits. ISQED emphasizes a holistic approach toward design quality and intends to highlight and accelerate cooperation among the IC Design, EDA, Semiconductor Process Technology and Manufacturing communities.
audience.gif (1326 bytes)
Designers and Design Managers of the Integrated Circuits & Integrated Systems (IP , SoC, SiP)
Researchers, Developers, and Users of  EDA/TCAD Tools & Design Flows and Methodologies
Process/Device Technologists, and Semiconductor Manufacturing Specialists

 

Views on Design for Quality & Manufacturing
Summary of Past ISQED Keynote Speeches and Industry Leaders

 

Industry Must Turn Its Attention to Quality

 

 Ali Iranmanesh

ISQED Founder and Chairman   

February 20, 2000

 

During the past 20 to 30 years, we have witnessed a phenomenal increase in the level of device scaling as well as in semiconductor manufacturing quality. This has enabled the industry to provide ever more complex electronic products. However, the advancement in semiconductor technology has drastically surpassed the progress in the capability and quality of EDA tools and design methodologies. The result is a fast-growing disparity between the available capability and what can be realized in design practice. The EDA industry's focus should therefore be not just in the traditional areas of performance, timing, area and power specification, but also in product yield, reliability, and manufacturability. Design-for-reliability, design-for-yield, and design-for-manufacturing should be integral parts of the modern design methodology. These, together with time-to-market considerations and performance, form the foundation of the quality electronic design. To achieve these targets, close coordination and cooperation among various disciplines involved in the design, development, and manufacturing of integrated circuits and systems are essential. In the late 20th century, the quality revolution in manufacturing led to phenomenal progress in semiconductor technology. The early 21st century will usher in the age of industry maturity, where these principles are successfully applied toward EDA tools, methodologies and processes.

 

Slap It Together And Ship It!

Aart J. de Geus
Chairman & CEO, Synopsys Inc.

ISQED 2000, March 21, 2000

 

In today’s world of e-commerce and dot-com instant business successes, time to market constraints have taken the upper hand in almost all product decisions. In that scenario, what happens to the role of quality in the design of semiconductors and electronic systems? In his keynote, Aart de Geus addressed the trade-offs of “market” needs vs. “quality” needs and showed that what appears to be a trade-off may not be one at all.

 

The Practical Side of Quality

John East
CEO, Actel Corporation

ISQED 2000, March 21, 2000

My practical definition of quality is getting it right the first time, on time. The downsides of poor quality work need no explanation. Unfortunately, though, the consequences of being late to market can doom any potential market advantage. The only sure win comes when the product is both high quality and on time. To help assure on-time delivery of working ICs, I advocate “two-handed management.” This means with one hand, do the job as best you can using the tools and techniques available, but with the other hand, take steps to see similar jobs are done better and faster the next time. An example of twohanded management in the distant past was the development of various simulation techniques. The two-handed manager of the future will look for silicon with advanced capabilities in the areas of “observability,” “tweakability” and incremental specification techniques as well as inherent improvements in speed, power and cost.

 

Design for Quality and Manufacturing

Prakash Agrawal
CEO, NeoMagic

ISQED 2000, March 21, 2000

This presentation will discuss from a CEO’s perspective the process needed to design a quality chip for manufacturing. It will cover the milestones necessary for bringing a successful chip to market. Discussion highlights will focus first on a well thought out analysis of market requirements, taking into account the product roadmaps and feature requirements of your major customers, the competition, the potential market size, and the delivery schedule necessary to hit the window of opportunity to sell the new product. Next, it will focus on how to proceed with a thorough evaluation of your company’s internal variables, such as your technology roadmap, cost analysis, capability of strategic partners, capacity requirements, and return on investment. Finally, it will give tips on evaluating the results of matching the market requirements with your company’s internal capabilities. It will mention some of the well-known design tools and practices used in the industry that can help you assure the built-in quality necessary to meet manufacturing standards and market needs.

   

Ramping New IC Products in the Deep Sub-micron Age

John Kibarian
CEO, PDF Solutions

ISQED 2000, March 21, 2000

It is well known that the majority of the potential profits are early in a products life. This is especially true in product segments such as system on a chip, graphics accelerators, microprocessors, and memory. The spoils in these segments go the company who gets its product to market first. At the same time, the investments required to produce the next generation products is going up at an accelerated pace. As a result, companies are sharing the investment by working with more third party suppliers. Today, a chip will be designed with 3rd party EDA tools and using commercial IP. It is often manufactured in commercial foundries, and tested and assembled a separate company. When the product is not meeting yield and performance, how are the issues resolved? Eventually, these yield issues are resolved, but often not before the profitable part of the product’s lifecycle is complete. In this presentation we describe new methodologies, tools and services which can help turn designs into products. We will summarize the key technical issues which make performance and yield targets difficult to meet given the product’s lifecycle constraints and demonstrate how these new methodologies can greatly change the production ramp. Examples of these methods applied to advanced products such as microprocessors, embedded DRAM, and system on a chip, and DRAM will be provided.

 

Platform-based Design: A Path to Efficient Design Re-Use

Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
Prof., UCB

ISQED 2000, March 22, 2000

System design is undergoing a series of radical transformations to meet performance, quality, safety, cost and time-to-market constraints introduced by the pervasive use of electronics in everyday objects. An essential component of the new system design paradigm is the orthogonalization of concerns, i.e., the separation of the various aspects of design to allow more effective exploration of alternative solutions. Since the mask set and design cost for Deep Sub-Micron implementations is predicted to be overwhelming, it is important to find common architectures that can support a variety of applications. In this talk, we will explore methods for selecting families of software and hardware architectures that allow a substantial design re-use and some paradigms for embedded system designs that are likely to become the pillars of future tools and flows.

 

Embedded-Quality for Test

Yervant Zorian
Chief Technology Advisor, LogicVision

ISQED 2000, March 22, 2000

The basic concept of embedding test functions onto the very IC design is a simple one. However, the complexity offered by the emerging system-on-chip and the very deep micron technologies has created difficult challenges and quality risks. A new wave of embedded, quality insurance functions, are needed to address this complexity level. This talk will discuss such design for quality trends and solutions and will analyze their impact not only on go/no-go test, but also on a set of expanded quality insurance functions to support debug, measurement, diagnosis and repair.

 

Deep Submicron ULSI Design Paradigm: Who is writing the future?

Kamran Eshraghian

Prof., Edith Cowan University

ISQED 2000, March 22, 2000

The concept of “ technology generation” attributed to Gordon Moore has created a plausible method for predicting the behavior of technology road map that has seen world’s production of silicon CMOS to exceed 75% of electronic related materials. A feature of such progress is characterized by the complexity factor that predicts the emergence of a new generation of technology every three years. A reasonable method of comparison would be to observe the parallel between CMOS based systems with those of biologically inspired systems. Deep submicron, synonymous with Ultra Large Scale of integration, suggests that by the year 2010 the number of transistors/chip will be in the order of 0.5x109, with an intrinsic clock speed of 3GHz. At this level of integration the classic MOS transistor would have only a few ‘electrons’ in the channel to direct. Thus, the reality of Quantum MOS (QMOS) transistor becomes a plausible possibility. In the mean time the question remains as to how are we going to cope with the design and quality of the new system complexity. ULSI design requires a shift in the design paradigm from current evolutionary thinking for system integration, to more of revolutionary approaches as depicted by attributes of “brain architecture”.

 

Future Platform for Mobile Communication

Hajimi Sasaki
Chairman of the Board, NEC

ISQED 2001, March 27, 2001

This keynote would explore three driving forces in the IT revolution that are actualizing an Information Society: first, the Internet global, ever expanding nature and second, the ability to create the ultimate personal information tool. And last, at the heart of these forces is the cutting-edge semiconductor device. Especially in mobile where products are composed primarily of semiconductors, we see that the creation of advanced semiconductor devices controls to a large degree the superior nature of the mobile product. Mobile products must balance many constraining criteria such as size and weight against functionality such as low power consumption. There are also a wide array of technologies involved such as low power consumption circuit design, flash memory and RF power device. Additionally, intellectual property has become even more important. Moreover, the harmonization of semiconductor technology and peripheral technologies such as smallscale, light-weight packaging technology, long life rechargeable batteries and flat panel displays has become an important factor.

 

Delivering Quality Delivers Profits

Joe Costello
CEO, think3

ISQED 2001, March 27, 2001

The future of electronics is SoC design. SoC design complexity is accelerating due to rapid change on multiple dimensions: design content, deep sub-micron (DSM) electrical and physical effects, and the sheer scale of SoC projects. At the same time, market windows are dramatically decreasing. These fundamental technology trends and economic forces underscore the need to rethink conventional design methodology and conventional business practices for SoC design delivery. An SoC design foundry, combining a fast and scalable mixed-signal SoC design methodology with innovative design technology and electrical engineering expertise, enables not only the timely delivery of SoC designs, but also robust design quality through electrically correct silicon engineering.

 

The Expanding Use of Formal Techniques in Electronic Design

Raul Camposano
CTO/GM, Synopsys, Inc.

ISQED 2001, March 27, 2001

Although Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools allow some tolerance for features having only limited scope or not working in all cases, there is no tolerance for error in their final results. Since the beginning, EDA tools have included so-called "formal" techniques to ensure such error-free results. More and more, formal verification tools are being adopted as a necessary part of mainstream design flows to tackle the exploding verification challenge. In this keynote address, we will focus on some of these formal techniques; in particular, equivalence checking, property checking, and the combination of simulation with formal techniques -- all of which play an important role in creating zero-defect results in state-of-the-art electronic design.

 

IC Design Methodology in the Foundry Era: Introducing ‘Heads-Up’ Design”

Edward C. Ross
President, TSMC, USA

ISQED 2001, March 27, 2001

The emergence of the foundry as a primary semiconductor manufacturing resource has created a seachange in the way EDA companies interact with manufacturers. Since the key concern for many foundry customers is time-to-volume, EDA companies are now focused not just on system-level design, but on “heads-up” design, e.g., bringing to designers the ability to build whole systems at the speed of thought. Dr. Ross discusses emerging trends in the EDA, IP, library and design center communities, wherein deep collaboration with foundries is producing a variety of Internet-based solutions that are revolutionizing IC design methodologies.

 

Quality of Design from an IC Manufacturing Perspective

Wojciech P. Maly
Professor, Carnegie Mellon University

ISQED 2001, March 28, 2001

There are many credible sources (including the ITRS) now seeing cost of IC manufacturing as a potentially negative factor that may affect the future of the IC industry. There are also a number of answers to the growing-cost-of-manufacturing challenge. One of them is IC design for efficient manufacturing -- measured by such indices as yield, time-to-volume, etc. The first objective of this presentation is to analyze publicly discussed visions for the IC industry and derive from them manufacturability conditions that must be met for these visions to materialize. We will focus our discussion on the recent version of the ITRS. It will be shown that ITRS predictions cannot be fulfilled by design or manufacturing approaches alone. Only by solving complex trade-offs on the design-test-manufacturing interface one may provide a chance to overcome the rising-cost-of manufacturing problem -- the main stumbling block on the ITRS horizon. The second objective of the presentation is to propose a redefinition of the notion of the quality of IC design, so it can accommodate manufacturability measures as primary design goals in addition to traditional die size, performance and time-to-first-silicon design quality indices. Such a re-definition is possible and maybe necessary contribution of the IC design community in addressing the rising-cost-of manufacturing problem.

 

Embedded Test Leads to Embedded Quality

Vinod Agrawal
CEO, Logic Vision

ISQED 2001, March 28, 2001

The concept of embedded test, wherein physical test engines are built right on to the semiconductor chip, has a very strong quality value throughout the lifecycle of the chip. These embedded testers can be reused throughout the lifetime of the chip from silicon debug, to characterization, to production testing (both wafer probe and final test), to board prototyping, to system integration and then finally to the diagnosis in the field. More than 50 semiconductor and system companies world-wide are already using embedded test in their complex chips, to gain significant quality, cycle time and economic competitive advantage. This talk will explore how embedded test is becoming a standard choice for IC and system developers.

 

Quality on Time

Aki Fujimura
COO and President, Simplex*

ISQED 2001, March 28, 2001
(*Simplex was acquired by Cadence in 2002)

How is it that a group of talented, highly motivated, hard-working software engineers consistently produce low-quality software, late? It is the speaker's view that schedule management and quality management go hand in hand. The traditional thinking that quality and schedule are tradeoffs is exactly the approach to engineering management that starts the downward spiral resulting in organizations that can never deliver quality software nor on-time delivery. The talk discusses the notion that schedules are probability distributions, and presents several practical quality and schedule management techniques.

 

Quality of SoC designs through quality of the design flow: Status and Needs

Philippe Magarshack
Vice President, Central R&D Group and Director, Design Automation, STMicroelectronics

ISQED 2001, March 28, 2001

It is now universally recognized that System-on-Chip (SoC) is the appropriate product solution to meet the demand of cost and volume for many electronics markets. The increasing pressures coming from shrinking market windows, accelerating process roadmaps and increasing mask costs, render necessary that SoC be correct at first silicon. This is becoming a considerable challenge due to the complexity of systems that can be built on the same chip: current process capabilities are approaching 100 million devices. Additionally, this level of integration comes at the price of renewed parasitic effects, such as crosstalk, voltage drop and electro-migration. A complex design flow is necessary to solve these conflicting trends, combining executable specifications, isolating function from communication, exploring architectures and trading off speed, power, area and schedules, and finally a fast route to implementation, be it in software running on embedded processors, dedicated digital hardware, or dedicated analog cells. The successive levels of abstraction of the system description warrant the need for extensive verification of the SoC, both at functional level, and at the timing, power and reliability levels. Building such a design flow calls for mixing very good point tools, coming from established EDA vendors as well as start ups and academia. But above all, it requires well-defined and structured interfaces between tools at key hand-off points in the design flow. Standard design languages and Application Programming Interfaces (API's) are fundamental to the success of SoC.

 

  IP REUSE QUALITY: “Intellectual Property” or “Intense Pain”?

John Chilton
Sr. VP and General Manager Synopsys, Inc.

ISQED 2002, March 19, 2002

As systems on a chip become more complex, reuse of third-party intellectual property (IP) becomes more necessary to meet time-to-market deadlines. However, issues surrounding IP quality are very much unresolved. Poor IP quality is the key reason why many IP users feel that “IP” is actually an acronym for “Intense Pain.” . There are major inconsistencies surrounding basic quality, including fully synchronous design, registered inputs and outputs for IP blocks, and completion of full specifications before design. All these inconsistencies contribute to difficulties in using the IP and integrating it into a chip design. One of the key reasons why quality is still such an issue within the IP community is the issue of “reuse” versus “salvaging.” Much of the IP sold over the last few years wasn’t really designed for reuse. Instead, it was designed for use in a single chip, then later repackaged (i.e., salvaged) as IP. There has also been tremendous interest in creating IP repositories—fancy Java based, Web-accessed, and multi-featured custom products meant to hold the wealth of IP. Along the way, though, we forgot to create enough fully reusable IP to warrant these repository investments. Although the challenges in the IP business may seem daunting (and there are many more besides just those that concern quality), they are well worth the effort when you consider the rewards. There’s a tremendous need for IP to address the growing productivity gap, which represents a great opportunity for the third-party IP industry.

 

Why Integrated Yield Management is a Necessity

Y. David Lepejian
President, CEO and Chairman HPL

ISQED 2002, March 19, 2002

Improving semiconductor yield is a multi-facetted process that must include design, manufacturing, and test. An integrated approach enables companies to rapidly reach higher levels of revenue and profitability. Incorporating design-for-yield concepts early, improving the quality of the test programs, and applying new technology to accelerate the measurement and correction of failure sources in the production process combine to have powerful effect upon company profits, product quality, and time to volume.

 

Design Success: Foundry Perspective

Jim Kupec
President, UMC USA

ISQED 2002, March 19, 2002

Leading edge foundries are rolling out new process technologies every two years with today’s advance processes capable of producing a quarter billion transistor on a thumb nail sized chip. The growth of the fabless business model has enabled many companies to organize and build value with the strength of their design capabilities. Quality is often reflected by the continued success of design practices resulting in market success. The many styles of design implementations provided by a large number of companies sharing a common process helps provide a Darwinian view of quality practices. The interaction with design flows, libraries, special purpose IP, memory types are important considerations. This talk will address the trade-offs and successful design technologies used in foundries.

 

What you don’t know CAN hurt you: Designing for survival in a sub-wavelength environment

Y.C. (Buno) Pati
President and CEO, Numerical Technologies

ISQED 2002, March 19, 2002

The semiconductor industry’s promise to deliver an endless array of chip designs to match the voracious appetite for smaller, faster, cheaper devices is in danger of ringing hollow. We could make this commitment with confidence up to recently. But, lately we’ve hit the wall. We’re crashing through the sub-wavelength barrier and we’re feeling our way toward designing and manufacturing chips in a challenging new environment without benefit of some key process technologies. Now, to survive and thrive, chipmakers are turning to phase shifting—just a novel, clever concept a few short years ago—as a critical and necessary enabler of producing integrated circuits at dimensions of 0.13 micron and below. Inevitably, chip designers are following suit, not just to match the chipmakers in their march to smaller feature sizes, but to polish their own competitive edge with high-performance chip designs that are easy to produce. They’re breaking out of a somewhat isolated mold, knowing that shrinking design times and increasing layout complexity call for new tools and expertise. Most acknowledge that the success of their designs, and indeed, their future viability depends on quickly adopting the tools and expertise that their chip making customers are using so effectively.

 

The Role of ICs in the Creation of a Connected World and the importance of Product Quality

Atiq Raza
Chairman and CEO, Raza Foundries Inc.

ISQED 2002, March 20, 2002

Human Beings being social have had a need to communicate. The modem chapter in enabling large-scale communication has been aided by intelligence in the transport, distribution, protection, traffic management, decoding, analyzing and displaying of communication content. The intelligence has been embedded in an explosive confluence of Software, Systems and Integrated Circuits. This has resulted in the most amazing transformation of the way we live our lives, work, and engage in all other necessary and capricious activity. It has also created a huge economic footprint on the Gross Domestic Product of the United States of America. With a massive transformation that has occurred in such a short time, this throbbing network across the planet has to operate reliably because of the precious payload it carries.

 

Wireless Systems-on-a-Chip Design

Bob Brodersen
Dept. of EECS, University of California, Berkeley

ISQED 2002, March 20, 2002

There is a fundamental shift that is occurring in the implementation of wireless systems. Not only is the underlying technology shifting to mainstream CMOS technology, but the applications and specifications of the supported links is also rapidly evolving. The multiple inter-related technologies required for implementation of such wireless systems requires a co-design strategy in communication algorithms, digital architectures as well the analog and digital circuits required for their implementation. Critical to good design of these chips is the definition of energy and area performance metrics that can facilitate the tradeoff of issues such as the cost of providing flexibility or the amount of parallelism to exploit. These design decisions can result in differences of orders of magnitude in the metrics between what is possible in the technology and what is often achieved if the costs are not fully understood. A design infrastructure which supports architectures, which optimizes the metrics, will be described for wireless systems that provides a fully automated chip design flow design flow from a high level system specification.

 

Microwave III-V Semiconductors for Telecommunications and Prospective of the III-V Industry

Chan Shin Wu
President & CEO WIN Semiconductors

ISQED 2002, March 20, 2002

 

The Microwave m- v semiconductor IC technology (Primarily GaAs) has emerged as a powerful, enabling, technology for the wireless and optical communications in the past 5 years. It has been dominating, or making substantial penetration into, the market for handset power amplifiers and switches, advanced wireless LAN RF front-ends and various other key RF components for broadband wireless, wireless infrastructure, satellite telecommunications, high data rate fiber optical communications and automotive radar applications. The Microwave III-V semiconductor IC industry has grown dramatically in the past 2-3 years. It is worth noting that the majority of the recently formed GaAs Fabs are located in Taiwan. Their intent is to provide pure-play foundry services following the silicon foundry business model developed by TSMC and UMC. In this presentation, we will discuss the key components of III-V microwave transistors (HBT, pHEMT and MESFET etc.) and their RFICs/MMICs, their electrical performance, major applications, market status, trends and opportunities. We will define the current status for the global m-v semiconductors industry, the rapidly growing GaAs MMIC Fab industry in Taiwan and its advantages for providing a one-stop, total solution for the wireless and optical communication components customers.

 

Tomorrows High-quality SoCs Require High-quality Embedded Memories Today

Ulf Schlichtmann
Senior Director, Infineon Technologies AG

ISQED 2002, March 20, 2002

Embedded memories increasingly dominate SoC designs -whether chip area, performance, power consumption, manufacturing yield or design time are considered. ITRS data indicate that the embedded memory contents of ICs may increase from 20% in 1999 to 90% at the SOnm node by the end of the decade. Therefore, even more than today, the success of tomorrow's SoC design will depend on the availability of high-quality embedded memories. Advanced process technologies pose new challenges for meeting these quality criteria. Some of the challenges are: providing flexible redundancy solutions for embedded SRAMs; designing competitive memories despite ever increasing leakage currents; reducing SRAM susceptibility to soft-error rate (SER). These challenges are bringing about the need for significant innovations in design of embedded memories, much more so than in recent previous process generations. In the presentation, the challenges will be outlined and solutions will be proposed. The focus of the discussion will be on SRAM/ROM, but other technologies such as eDRAM and "IT SRAM" will also be addressed.

 

Platform Leadership in the Ambient Intelligence Era

Bob Payne

US CTO and Senior Vice President/GM of System ASIC Technology, Philips Semiconductors

ISQED 2003, March 25, 2003

 

Design reuse has become essential to cope with the ever-increasing design complexity. IP level reuse alone has proven insufficient. Platform based design allows the validation of a robust combination of IP blocks and provides a reference HW and SW baseline which can be supported with an integrated development environment. Several years ago we transitioned into the streaming data era with most systems serving as content generation appliances, content consumption appliances or content distribution equipment. Now we have entered the age of ambient intelligence where the streaming data is served up through wireless links. What will platform leadership look like in this new era? How will the SoC infrastructure change as we move to 90nm technology with more than 30M gate per square centimeter integration capacity? How are usage patterns changing and what represents the killer application that enhances the users quality of life by enabling more advanced interaction with the ambient intelligence? What is it going to take to make a step function improvement in system level design productivity? What happens when power optimization becomes the dominant design consideration? What about SoC affordability? What will the SoC design of the future look like? These are just some of the thought provoking issues that will be addressed in Bob Payne’s keynote.

 

 

    

Quality SoC Design and Implementation for Real Manufacturability

   

Susumu Kohyama

Corporate Senior Vice President, Toshiba Corporation

ISQED 2003, March 25, 2003

 

 

Device miniaturization near 100nm node and beyond together with extreme multi-level interconnect started to create fundamental economical and engineering challenges. Especially, past success model of “Layer Masters” confessed difficulties to fill the gaps between each separated layers to complete integrated results, for meeting performance and yield with a reasonable timing. However, it is also obvious that classic IDM model proved to be so inefficient,  since inevitable separation and standardization of various aspects of design and technology are not established adequately. Those issues are even more significant when we discuss complex SoCs for 90nm and 65nm nodes, where design and implementation commingle in various different manners. A solution for these challenges is a new open idm model where open collaboration and strong differentiator are essential.

This presentation will discuss from a “SOC Centric Open IDM” perspective, the whole flow of design and implementation for real manufacturability, where true knowledge of integration and management skill function to enhance differentiators on top of open platforms.

 

 

 

Quality Challenges of the Nanometer Design Realm

Ted Vucurevich

Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Office, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

ISQED 2003, March 25, 2003

 

 

It is commonly agreed that sub-nanometer design is electronic design technology’s next big challenge. With the economic stakes higher than ever, the vendors of electronic design solutions must put themselves into their customers’ shoes through comprehensive, high-quality programs. My understanding of the differences designers face at geometries below 100 nanometers has led to my discussion of some of the challenges the industry faces in the sub-nanometer realm. This includes the domination of wires in digital design, which requires the ability to design the best quality wires through continuous convergence, a wire-centric methodology. In the nanometer world, the front-end and back-end disappear, leaving the prototype as the chip. This includes detailed wiring, and a new full-chip iteration every day. Most sub-nanometer ICs and SOCs will be digital/mixed-signal. This leads to custom design issues, such as integrating sensitive circuits with massive digital and mixed-signal design, productivity and foundry interface. Nanometer soc verification includes digital, analog and software, and a 70 percent silicon re-spin rate because of associated functional errors. At sub-nanometer levels, design-in becomes a major bottleneck, especially across a design chain, which can only be solved by silicon-package-board co-design.

 

 

        

Addressing the IC Designer’s Needs: Integrated Design Software for Faster, More Economical Chip Design

 

Rajeev Madhavan

Chairman & CEO, Magma Design Automation

ISQED 2003, March 26, 2003

 

Electronic design automation continues to attract a great deal of investment from the venture community, fostering the creation of startup companies focused on developing unique point-tool solutions. While many innovative new technologies come from this, industry must consider the increasingly critical need of IC designers and manufacturers: integrated design flows that enable the design and production of chips with fewer resources and in less time, without compromising the quality of results. Increasingly evident is the advantage of integrated design and the economies it brings while delivering the same quality of results as point-tool-based approaches.  The future of EDA depends on the industry’s ability to deliver solutions that enable the IC industry’s integration of electronic design tools and processes as it relies on EDA to provide the means for producing the next generation of semiconductor products.

 

Closing the Gap Between ASIC and Full Custom: A Path to Quality Design

 

Michael Reinhardt

President & CEO, RubiCad Corporation

ISQED 2003, March 26, 2003

   

Although process technology has shrunk down to nanometer features over the last decade, the gap between ASIC design and full-custom ic design has widened. This gap includes significant differences in performance, price, and profit between the two design styles. It is also revealed by huge differences in quality between the two styles in speed, power distribution and consumption, yield, and reliability, in some cases as much as an order of magnitude. To fully utilize the latest process technologies, a full-custom design approach with the productivity of an ASIC flow is necessary.

 

 


  

A VLSI System Perspective for  Microprocessors Beyond 90nm

 

Shekhar Borkar

Fellow & Director of Circuit Research lab, Intel Corporation

ISQED 2003, March 26, 2003

 

Microprocessor performance increased by five orders of magnitude in the last three decades. This was made possible by continued technology scaling, improving transistor performance to increase frequency, increasing integration capacity to realize complex architectures, and reducing energy consumed per logic operation to keep power dissipation within limit. The technology treadmill will continue to fulfill the microprocessor performance demand; however, with some adverse effects posing barriers—limited by power delivery and dissipation—and not by manufacturing or cost. Therefore, performance at any cost will not be an option; significant improvements in efficiency of transistor utilization will be necessary. This talk will discuss potential solutions in all disciplines, such as micro-architecture, circuits, design technologies & methodologies, thermals, and power delivery, to overcome these barriers for microprocessors beyond 90nm.

 

 

Simplify: Enable Quality, Enable Innovation

 

John Chilton
Sr. VP and General Manager, Synopsys, Inc.

ISQED 2004, March 23, 2004

 

As the old sales adage goes, “Nothing happens until somebody sells something.” For the semiconductor-based electronics industry, the never-ending challenge is to find and sell the next IC-based new “something” (or “somethings”) that consumers just can’t live without. It’s an immense and extremely expensive undertaking to find/create/deliver a killer app, requiring a single-minded, undistracted business focus and an immense amount of creative design innovation. Fortunately, there is a wealth of business-savvy, creative systems companies able to meet that challenge, as long as they are free to concentrate on what drives their core competency: designing and selling exciting new business systems and consumer devices. What they need from their chip manufacturers is an agreement on specs, models, pricing, and delivery. Simple. Fortunately, there are semiconductor firms up to the challenge, as long as they are free to exercise their core mission: designing and selling faster and slicker chips, often now with software and boards attached. They need to focus on taking their customer’s performance specifications and turning out a system on a chip that does exactly those things, on time and on budget. What they need from their EDA vendors are tightly integrated design tools that allow them to meet their goals of performance, price, and predictability. Simple.
Unfortunately, these industries don’t reflect this simplified, rosy picture… yet. The hard reality is, however, that they do have to get there, and soon, or live with dwindling prospects for the future. This presentation will discuss strategies for simplifying the semiconductor value chain, thereby enabling each segment to focus on doing well what it does best, for the sake of the future of the entire electronics industry.    
 

 

Design for Manufacturing? Design for Yield!!!

   

 

Marc Levitt

Vice President and General Manager

 Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

ISQED 2004, March 23, 2004

 

Today’s nanometer-scale designs are two orders-of-magnitude more complex than designs were in the early 1990s and are commonly manufactured with processes at or below the 130nm feature size. This has brought about a fundamental change in the way design teams must approach the release for their design data to their manufacturing partners. In the past, once a design was taped out and proven to be functional, the responsibility for ramping yield and enhancing the profitability of a design was primarily the responsibility of the manufacturing partner. This is no longer possible at 130nm and below. Once a manufacturing process has stabilized, direct action must be taken by each and every design team to "tune" their design for yield. Design-specific yield enhancement is the new frontier in EDA and while it includes the traditional Design for Manufacturing (DFM) technologies, it also covers much more. Failure to consider yield-degrading effects in IR drop, signal integrity, electro migration, and process variation will result is severe downstream problems in timing closure, functional errors during system bring-up, and the inability to achieve silicon yield and quality targets.

 

 

Nanotechnology-Nanoscale Molecular Memory

 

Shih-Yuan (SY) Wang 

Senior Scientist Quantum Science Research

Hewlett Packard Laboratories

ISQED 2004, March 23, 2004

 

 

An overview of nanotechnology research at HP Labs/ Quantum Science Research will be given with focus on nanoscale molecular memories. Densities of 100 Gb/cm2 are within reach. QSR aim is to break away from the current “scaling” down approach and look for and/or invent innovative approaches that have the potential for high volume manufacturability to break through the ITRS Red Brick Wall and push the limit of the technology. Nanofabrication challenges and possible applications will also be discussed.

 

 

 

Digitally Named World: Challenges for New Social Infrastructures

Hiroto Yasuura
System Research Center
Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

ISQED 2004, March 24, 2004

 

 

In the last three decades of the 20th century, many information and communication technologies have been developed and also introduced in social infrastructures, which are supporting our daily lives. Since the information technologies have progressed very rapidly, the basic structure of each social infrastructure, which was mostly designed in the 19th or the beginning of 20th centuries with few possibility of information technology, should be redesigned with an assumption of the existence of the advanced information technologies. Based on the high-performance SoCs (System-on-a-Chips) connected by wide-band networks, we can design next generation of social systems, which are directly related with quality of our society including individual rights and national security. In this talk, two social infrastructure information technologies are introduced. Personal Identifier (PID) system is an infrastructure for bidirectional mutual authentication, which will be used for electric commerce and governmental services. An RF-ID tag system is also important technology to implement efficient management of products and economic activities. Using PID and RF-ID tags, we can bridge a gap between the real world and the virtual one on computers automatically. We call the society, in which all persons and goods have their own digital names (identifiers) and are recognizable both in the real and virtual world, Digitally Named World. The systems require advanced technologies of SoC, networking, security and software. Here, technical challenges and social requirements for the new technologies are discussed. Some people are afraid of the infringement of their privacy in the digitally named world. Our discussions also include the technology to protect privacy and individual rights as well as efficiency and stability of our society.

 

 

 

Designing High Quality, Scaleable SoC’s with Heterogeneous Components

 

Pierre G. Paulin
Director, SoC Platform Automation
Central R&D, STMicroelectronics,
Ottawa, Canada

ISQED 2004, March 24, 2004

 

   

Today’s SoC’s combine an increasingly wide range of heterogenous processing elements, consisting of general purpose RISC’s, DSP’s, application-specific processors, and fixed or configurable hardware. Five to ten processors on an SoC is now common. A bottom-up assembly of these heterogeneous components using an ad-hoc interconnect topology, different instruction sets and embedded S/W development tools leads to unmanageable complexity and low quality. This talk will present an approach to effectively integrate heterogenous parallel components – H/W or S/W – into a homogeneous programming environment. This leads to higher quality designs through encapsulation and abstraction. This approach, supported by ST’s MultiFlex multi-processing SoC tools, allows for the combination of a range of heterogeneous processing elements, supported by high-level programming models. Two programming models are supported: a distributed system object component (DSOC) message passing model, and a symmetrical multi-processing (SMP) model using shared memory. We present the results of mapping an Internet traffic management application, running at 2.5Gb/s. We demonstrate the combined use of the MultiFlex multi-processor compilation tools, supported by high-speed hardware-assisted messaging, context-switching and dynamic task allocation in the StepNP platform.

 

 

Performance Limitations of Devices and Interconnects

and Possible Alternatives for Nanoelectronics

 

Krishna Saraswat
Rickey/Nielsen Professor of Engineering
Stanford University

ISQED 2004, March 24, 2004

 

For over three decades, there has been a quadrupling of transistor density and a doubling of electrical performance every 2 to 3 years. Si transistor technology, in particular CMOS has played a pivotal role in this. It is believed that continued scaling will take the industry down to the 35-nm technology node, at the limit of the ”long-term” range of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). However, it is also well accepted that this long-term range of the 70-nm to 35-nm nodes remains solidly in the “no-known solution” category. The difficulty in scaling the conventional MOSFET makes it prudent to search for alternative device structures. This will require new structural, material and fabrication technology solutions that are generally compatible with current and forecasted installed Semiconductor Manufacturing. In addition, new and revolutionary device concepts need to be discovered and evolved. These can be split into two categories: one is the continued used of silicon FET-type devices but with additional materials, e.g., Ge and innovative structural aspects that deviate from the classical planar/bulk MOSFET, e.g., double gate MOSFET. The second category is a set of potentially entirely different information processing and transmission devices from the transistor as we know it, e.g. silicon-based quantum-effect devices, nano-tube electronics and molecular and organic semiconductor electronics. Continuous scaling of VLSI circuits can pose significant problems for interconnects, especially for those responsible for long distance communication on a high performance chip. Our modeling predicts that the situation is worse than anticipated in the ITRS, which assumes that the resistivity of copper will not change appreciably with scaling in the future. We show that resistance of interconnect wires in light of scaling induced increase in electron surface scattering, fractional cross section area occupied by the high resistivity barrier and realistic interconnect operation temperature will lead to a significant rise in the effective resistivity of Cu. As a result both power and delay of these interconnects is likely to rise significantly in the future. In the light of various metal interconnect limitations, alternate solutions need to be pursued. We focus on two such solutions, optical interconnects and three-dimensional (3-D) ICs with multiplicative Si layers.

 

 

Enabling True Design for Manufacturability

  John Kibarian

President & CEO, PDF Solutions

ISQED 2005, March 22, 2005

 

Without any doubt, Design For Manufacturability has been the hottest buzzword for the last couple of years. This is quite justifiable by the enormous challenges in nanometer technology nodes and ever increasing design-process interactions. As a result, virtually all EDA companies have focused on providing the "DFM Solutions".  Since the concept of DFM covers an extremely broad spectrum of tasks from the system level all the way to the manufacturing process, many of these DFM solutions are just the re-labeled design verification tasks. 

 

 

Recent progress and remaining challenges in pattern transfer technologies for advanced chip designs

Ashok K. Sinha

Sr. VP & GM

Applied Materials, Inc

ISQED 2005, March 22, 2005

 

Even as the Moore's law continues to drive "tiny technologies" through relentless scaling, the main technology driver for semiconductor chips has evolved from DRAMs to Microprocessors to FPGAs. The underlying metrics have evolved from bits per chip and cost per bit for computers to functions per chip and cost per function for consumer products. This talk will review the remarkable progress that has been made in enabling pattern transfer technologies, including mask design, lithography enhancements and precision etching on the new 300mm wafers for an increasingly wide variety of new materials. However, there is a cost associated with all this and the cost-benefit tradeoffs will almost certainly drive new inflections in the entire food chain, which I will try to identify.

 

Shifting Perspectives on DFM

  Janusz Rajski

Chief Scientist, Design Verification and Test Division 

Mentor Graphics

ISQED 2005, March 22, 2005

 

Nanometer technology has ushered in new and significant yield and manufacturing considerations and constraints. The lack of major increase in yield improvement between the 350nm and 180nm nodes suggests that the yield loss mechanisms are not only increasing in numbers, magnitude, and complexity at each successive generation, but they are increasing at a rate fast enough to largely offset ‘cosmetic’ improvements in tools and methodologies. If EDA tools are to assist the semiconductor industry at the 90nm and 65nm nodes, there must be profound changes to existing tools, and the introduction of new technologies that allow designers to consider and optimize for manufacturing at each stage of the design, verification, tapeout and test process.

 

 

Collaboration, Quality and Value in the Design Chain

  David Courtright

Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Cadence Design Systems

ISQED 2005, March 23, 2005

 

 

Meeting the challenges of product development cycles and managing the complexity of increased semiconductor functionality has created a demand for a virtual reaggregation of the silicon design chain.  These challenges continue to multiply with the concurrent move to smaller geometries. This presentation, will address the challenges by calling for an industry commitment to collaborate across the design chain.  It is shown how collaboration is necessary for companies to meet time-to-market demands and manage the increasing complexity in chip design, while preserving the intellectual property of each member of the design chain. The speaker will also discuss the need for developing higher quality EDA tools as a means to the end of developing the next generation of electronics products.

 

 

IP Quality: A New Model that Faces Methodology and Management Challenges

 

Kurt A. Wolf

Director, Library Management Division

TSMC

ISQED 2005, March 23, 2005

 

 

The promised value and productivity from re-aggregating the IC design chain isn’t always delivered, in part because of isolated IP product development/quality related practices, and in part because of an inability, from a design management perspective, to see “big picture” issues in the IP marketplace.  However, these challenges are not insurmountable. The concern over IP quality has rightfully grown over the past years as the future growth of the IC industry depends on two factors; a) achieving higher levels of design productivity and b) shifting internal resources towards creating and delivering value-added user benefits that stimulate increased end-product consumption.  While the second factor is not discussed in this presentation, there’s a presumption that higher IP quality and productivity enables a shift of resources to more applications-oriented design.

A pre-requisite to achieving the productivity gains is substantial improvements in the level of IP quality, coupled with increased forethought during product development. This presentation describes a methodology to evaluate IP for SOC integration.  The focus is on development & quality verification practices that also account for the issues of IP integration. Additionally, the long-term growth of the semiconductor industry may be limited by the lack of value placed on collaboration, support, quality verification, and due diligence between SOC design teams and their IP partners. This presentation also describes improvements in the Hard IP business relationship between these groups that enable dramatic growth through slight changes in communications models.  By developing reasonable expectations and focusing on open discussion between each group, perspective begins to shift.  The true value of the design team and IP partnership is a function of successful collaborations – not when the user squeezes the last drop out of NRE, royalty, per-use, or other financing models.  And the value-add of the partnership is realized when that collaboration includes additional real, shared incentives that more fully value the IP industry, rather than focus on purely lowest cost.

 

 

SoC Engineering Trends as Impacted by New Applications and System Level Requirements

 

Bernard Candaele

Department Head, SoC, IC & EDA

Thales, Paris Colombes, France

ISQED 2005, March 23, 2005

 

The SoC increasing integration scale as well as the system and customer requirements are important factors for a complete revisit of the development models for electronic products. New customer models ask for software driven electronics. Software engineering is moving to a component-based and MDA development approach to be applied to embedded applications. Hardware engineering is moving to SSDI System Level Development and Reuse methodologies. The 2 approaches have now to be further developed and combined for next generations SoC’s to get high quality and adaptable designs at a reasonable development cost.  New application-level quality standards have also to be part of the complete development flow. It is demonstrated through several examples these new methodologies: system engineering methodology on software radios (UML, PIM Platform Independent Model and PSM Platform Specific Model) and its current extension to the hardware parts (SCA, OCP potential extensions), system engineering in line with the C